Frustrated with Business Disputes and with Courts? Mediation India can help. Read Now!
Take control of your dispute
There is a clear and beneficial
alternative today, to help substantially reduce your time, cost and frustration
- and with you being in control of the outcome.
Welcome to Mediation, which is not only an integral part of the out-of-court Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process, but the most apt for helping resolve and bringing a finality and closure to your business and commercial disputes.
So what do you have to do?
First, try to read a little about Mediation. Mediation is a facilitated negotiation of a dispute, whereby a Meduator helps the parties move towards a settlement of their dispute. Based on my business/commercial experience and Mediation trainings, I have tried to provide simple answers to many of the queries that anyone in such situations may have. You can view this at the website mediationindia.in
Then reach out for a Mediator.
Apart from us there are good Mediation organisations like DResolute and KD Lex
Chambers. The Mediator would discuss with you and then call the other party on
your behalf (or you can jointly look for and agree on a Mediator). Since
Mediation is voluntary, both parties need to agree to try out Mediation for the
resolution of their dispute. Of course the Mediator would help with this.
At this stage it is important to
bring in the scope for your lawyer, as well as what is referred to as
court-annexed Mediation. A lawyer/advocate is, by education, skills and
experience, an integral part of the court adversarial system, whereby a judgement
is given for or against a party (one proven 'right', the other 'wrong'), based
on evidence advanced, advocacy skills, and the interpretation of law. An
experienced lawyer is not by nature, training or skill a 'neutral'. The
lawyer's role is to find every evidence or interpretation or loophole that
would benefit one party, his/her client.
So the appointment of a court
advocate as a Mediator, by a judge, despite the advocate's having undertaken
some training in Mediation, is not the best choice for a party looking for
Mediation (of course there are worthy exceptions). The fees paid to a Mediator
in court-annexed Mediation is paltry. And so only the real dedicated advocates
cum mediators would take it up seriously as a profession. The result is often
lacklustre. The results are
better in the matrimonial or small value commercial matters, where cases and
successes are higher.
Therefore
it is the party that has to decide to undertake Mediation, since anyway it is
the party (not his/her lawyer or a judge or arbitrator) that would participate
and also decide the outcome. Of course, since lawyers are often trusted
associates, I would recommend that before finalising the Settlement, you must
ask your lawyer whether the outcome in court would decidedly be better. If the
Settlement is considered appropriate, the lawyer would help in framing the
terms of the Settlement. For these services, the lawyer should be suitably
compensated (there is little precedent, so it is discretionary).
The better alternative for a party
in a case that is of some importance, is to appoint a private Mediator. Even if
the case is in court, the judge would allow, as long as both parties agree. The
Mediators offering private Mediation are less in number, but are skilled,
dedicated Mediators.
Last, for the future, please put a
clause as an add-on within your dispute resolution sections, in all your
agreements and contracts, as follows:
'In case of a dispute arising out
of any or all the terms of this Agreement/Contract, the Parties agree to first
undertake Mediation (for a period of upto 90 days) before proceeding with any
other form of resolution of their dispute. The Mediator would be jointly agreed
upon by the Parties.'
End your frustration. Take control
of your dispute.
Comments
Post a Comment